<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>david (b) hayes &#187; Link Banana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidbhayes.com/category/link-banana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidbhayes.com</link>
	<description>That&#039;s My Name!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:29:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A.D.D. Drugs Don’t Work</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/02/03/a-d-d-drugs-dont-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/02/03/a-d-d-drugs-dont-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david (b) hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Banana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbanana.com/?p=4539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A.D.D. Drugs Don&#8217;t Work L. Alan Sroufe&#8217;s argument against medicating children is good. But it also contains the most succinct takedown of the entire psycho-pharmechological complex I can imagine: Thus, only one question is asked: are there aspects of brain functioning associated with childhood attention problems? The answer is always yes. Overlooked is the very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/29/opinion/sunday/childrens-add-drugs-dont-work-long-term.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all">A.D.D. Drugs Don&#8217;t Work</a>
	</p><p>L. Alan Sroufe&#8217;s argument against medicating children is good. But it also contains the most succinct takedown of the entire psycho-pharmechological complex I can imagine:</p>
<blockquote><p>Thus, only one question is asked: are there aspects of brain functioning associated with childhood attention problems? The answer is always yes. Overlooked is the very real possibility that both the brain anomalies and the A.D.D. result from experience.</p></blockquote>
<p>(via <a href="http://thebrowser.com/articles/ritalin-gone-wrong">The Browser</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/02/03/a-d-d-drugs-dont-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A.D.D. Drugs Don’t Work</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/02/03/a-d-d-drugs-dont-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/02/03/a-d-d-drugs-dont-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david (b) hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Banana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbanana.com/?p=4539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A.D.D. Drugs Don&#8217;t Work L. Alan Sroufe&#8217;s argument against medicating children is good. But it also contains the most succinct takedown of the entire psycho-pharmechological complex I can imagine: Thus, only one question is asked: are there aspects of brain functioning associated with childhood attention problems? The answer is always yes. Overlooked is the very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/29/opinion/sunday/childrens-add-drugs-dont-work-long-term.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all">A.D.D. Drugs Don&#8217;t Work</a>
	</p><p>L. Alan Sroufe&#8217;s argument against medicating children is good. But it also contains the most succinct takedown of the entire psycho-pharmechological complex I can imagine:</p>
<blockquote><p>Thus, only one question is asked: are there aspects of brain functioning associated with childhood attention problems? The answer is always yes. Overlooked is the very real possibility that both the brain anomalies and the A.D.D. result from experience.</p></blockquote>
<p>(via <a href="http://thebrowser.com/articles/ritalin-gone-wrong">The Browser</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/02/03/a-d-d-drugs-dont-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nano Quadrotors</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/linkbanana/~3/RKmAyYMFCww/</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/linkbanana/~3/RKmAyYMFCww/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david (b) hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Banana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbanana.com/?p=4536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	Nano Quadrotors
	Alternate title: Why Humans Would Lose the Robot Wars
Seriously, these things are impressive. Like, scary impressive. The presentation style is dry, but the last few demonstrations are awesome. (And again, a little disturbing.)
(via ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQIMGV5vtd4">Nano Quadrotors</a>
	</p><p>Alternate title: Why Humans Would Lose the Robot Wars</p>
<p>Seriously, these things are impressive. Like, scary impressive. The presentation style is dry, but the last few demonstrations are awesome. (And again, a little disturbing.)</p>
<p>(via <a href="http://waxy.org/links/">Waxy</a>)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/linkbanana/~4/RKmAyYMFCww" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/02/03/nano-quadrotors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Past Imperfect</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/02/02/past-imperfect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/02/02/past-imperfect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david (b) hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Banana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbanana.com/?p=4532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Past Imperfect The Smithsonian magazine&#8217;s Past Imperfect blog is just about perfect. Little bits of history well-told and well-documented. There&#8217;s a bit of an American and popular bent, but it doesn&#8217;t make it less awesome. I found this because The Browser&#8217;s linked to multiple stories from it (which were all interesting, but didn&#8217;t exactly stand alone). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/">Past Imperfect</a>
	</p><p>The <em>Smithsonian</em> magazine&#8217;s Past Imperfect blog is just about perfect. Little bits of history well-told and well-documented. There&#8217;s a bit of an American and popular bent, but it doesn&#8217;t make it less awesome.</p>
<p>I found this because The Browser&#8217;s linked to multiple stories from it (which were all interesting, but didn&#8217;t exactly stand alone). Just today <a href="http://thebrowser.com/articles/most-terrible-polar-exploration-ever">they linked</a> to <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/01/the-most-terrible-polar-exploration-ever-douglas-mawsons-antarctic-journey/">this one</a>, which might have been able to stand alone, but then you might not have noticed how good its holder is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/02/02/past-imperfect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alain de Botton</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/30/alain-de-botton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/30/alain-de-botton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david (b) hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Banana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbanana.com/?p=4529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alain de Botton I link to this story not because it&#8217;s exceptionally good (it&#8217;s not bad, just unexceptional), but because I find its subject rather interesting. I can&#8217;t help but feel affinity for people making points like this: &#8220;The arrogance that says analysing the relationship between reasons and causes is more important than writing a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2012/jan/20/alain-de-botton-life-in-writing">Alain de Botton</a>
	</p><p>I link to this story not because it&#8217;s exceptionally good (it&#8217;s not bad, just unexceptional), but because I find its subject rather interesting. I can&#8217;t help but feel affinity for people making points like this:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The arrogance that says analysing the relationship between reasons and causes is more important than writing a philosophy of shyness or sadness or friendship drives me nuts. I can&#8217;t accept that.</p>
<p>&#8220;I had a line in the book I cut that said &#8216;The nirvana would be if the questions raised by Oprah Winfrey would be answered by the faculty at Harvard.&#8217; The questions she asks are the most central – how do we live with other people, how do we cope with our ambitions, how do we survive as a society – though she fails to answer them with anything like seriousness.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And though I would characterize it as similarly unexceptional, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=2Oe6HUgrRlQ">his most recent TED talk</a> was recently made available.</p>
<p>(via <a href="http://www.aldaily.com/">ALD</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/30/alain-de-botton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Legal Case of Israeli Settlements</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/29/the-legal-case-of-israeli-settlements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/29/the-legal-case-of-israeli-settlements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david (b) hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Banana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbanana.com/?p=4526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Legal Case of Israeli Settlements Eyal Press&#8217;s review of a new film that premiered at Sundance is very good, but also stands alone as a story of how Israel came to support the interests of overzealous ultra-Zionists instead of international law. The Ottomans, who had controlled Palestine until World War I, had used the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/jan/25/how-occupation-became-legal/">The Legal Case of Israeli Settlements</a>
	</p><p>Eyal Press&#8217;s review of a new film that premiered at Sundance is very good, but also stands alone as a story of how Israel came to support the interests of overzealous ultra-Zionists instead of international law.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Ottomans, who had controlled Palestine until World War I, had used the term to designate land far enough from any neighboring village that a crowing rooster perched on its edge could not be heard. Under Ottoman law, if such land was not cultivated for three years it was “mawat”—dead —and reverted to the empire. “With or without your rooster, be at my office at 8:00 in the morning,” Sharon told Ramati, who was soon crisscrossing the West Bank in the cockpit of a helicopter, identifying tens of thousands of uninhabited acres that could be labeled “state land” and made available to settlers, notwithstanding the Geneva Convention’s prohibition on moving civilians into occupied territory.</p></blockquote>
<p>(The fact that the film premiered and Sundance and probably won&#8217;t be available for normal people for over a year makes <a href="http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/28/what-hollywood-doesnt-get/">yesterday&#8217;s point</a> all over again.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/29/the-legal-case-of-israeli-settlements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Hollywood Doesn’t Get</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/28/what-hollywood-doesnt-get/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/28/what-hollywood-doesnt-get/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david (b) hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Banana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbanana.com/?p=4524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Hollywood Doesn&#8217;t Get I don&#8217;t do much news here these days&#8201;&#8212;&#8201;I have neither the time nor desire&#8201;&#8212;&#8201;but I think the latest deal that Warner Bros has hammered out with Netflix is such a perfect distillation of the whole mess they&#8217;re in that I can&#8217;t ignore this story. Not only you will you not be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://www.appleoutsider.com/2012/01/26/hollywood/">What Hollywood Doesn&#8217;t Get</a>
	</p><p>I don&#8217;t do much news here these days&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;I have neither the time nor desire&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;but I think the latest deal that Warner Bros has hammered out with Netflix is such a perfect distillation of the whole mess they&#8217;re in that I can&#8217;t ignore this story. Not only you will you not be able to get a movie on Netflix until <em>two months</em> after the DVD goes on sale, you&#8217;ll now not even to be able to add it to your queue until a month after. Matt Drance makes the point succinctly:</p>
<blockquote><p>It continues to punish the people who play by the rules with an insufferable customer experience. This is the sole reason piracy is up and profits are down: because <em>doing it right </em><em>totally sucks</em>. And that’s apparently how the studios want it.</p></blockquote>
<p>(via <a href="http://brooksreview.net/2012/01/drance-right/">Ben Brooks</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/28/what-hollywood-doesnt-get/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drones, Democracy, and War</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/28/drones-democracy-and-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/28/drones-democracy-and-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david (b) hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Banana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbanana.com/?p=4520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drones, Democracy, and War Peter W. Singer, not the famous Australian utilitarian philosopher, considers some of the ramifications of the seemingly risk-free war the United States is carrying out in Pakistan. And now we possess a technology that removes the last political barriers to war. The strongest appeal of unmanned systems is that we don’t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/opinion/sunday/do-drones-undermine-democracy.html?pagewanted=all">Drones, Democracy, and War</a>
	</p><p>Peter W. Singer, not the famous Australian utilitarian philosopher, considers some of the ramifications of the seemingly risk-free war the United States is carrying out in Pakistan.</p>
<blockquote><p>And now we possess a technology that removes the last political barriers to war. The strongest appeal of unmanned systems is that we don’t have to send someone’s son or daughter into harm’s way. But when politicians can avoid the political consequences of the condolence letter — and the impact that military casualties have on voters and on the news media — they no longer treat the previously weighty matters of war and peace the same way.</p></blockquote>
<p>(via <a href="http://thebrowser.com/articles/do-drones-undermine-democracy">The Browser</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/28/drones-democracy-and-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let the Robot Drive</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/linkbanana/~3/iRV9CJsedmM/</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/linkbanana/~3/iRV9CJsedmM/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david (b) hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Banana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbanana.com/?p=4518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let the Robot Drive Tom Vanderbilt has an enjoyable piece in Wired about the convergence between Google&#8217;s famous driverless car, and the progress toward a similar goal being made by traditional automakers. He spends some time, as well, considering the legal wasteland that exists around these technologies. The crucial point though: [As we ride, Google&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2012/01/ff_autonomouscars/all/1">Let the Robot Drive</a>
	</p><p>Tom Vanderbilt has an enjoyable piece in <em>Wired</em> about the convergence between Google&#8217;s famous driverless car, and the progress toward a similar goal being made by traditional automakers. He spends some time, as well, considering the legal wasteland that exists around these technologies. The crucial point though:</p>
<blockquote><p>[As we ride, Google&#8217;s driver-less] Prius begins to seem like the Platonic ideal of a driver, against which all others fall short. It can think faster than any mortal driver. It can attend to more information, react more quickly to emergencies, and keep track of more complicated routes. It never panics. It never gets angry. It never even blinks. In short, it is better than human in just about every way.</p></blockquote>
<p>(via <a href="http://thebrowser.com/articles/let-robot-drive">The Browser</a>)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/linkbanana/~4/iRV9CJsedmM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/27/let-the-robot-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nightclubs are Hell</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/24/nightclubs-are-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/24/nightclubs-are-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david (b) hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Banana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbanana.com/?p=4515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nightclubs are Hell I&#8217;m not sure how useful this old piece from Charlie Brooker is, but because it&#8217;s almost exactly how I feel about them, I found it quite enjoyable. I&#8217;ve certainly thought things like this before: I&#8217;m convinced no one actually likes clubs. It&#8217;s a conspiracy. We&#8217;ve been told they&#8217;re cool and fun; that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/aug/13/fashion.comment">Nightclubs are Hell</a>
	</p><p>I&#8217;m not sure how useful this old piece from Charlie Brooker is, but because it&#8217;s almost exactly how I feel about them, I found it quite enjoyable. I&#8217;ve certainly thought things like this before:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m convinced no one actually likes clubs. It&#8217;s a conspiracy. We&#8217;ve been told they&#8217;re cool and fun; that only &#8220;saddoes&#8221; dislike them. And no one in our pathetic little pre-apocalyptic timebubble wants to be labelled &#8220;sad&#8221; - it&#8217;s like being officially declared worthless by the state. So we muster a grin and go out on the town in our millions.</p></blockquote>
<p>(via a reddit comment I couldn&#8217;t find)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbanana.com/2012/01/24/nightclubs-are-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

